The AVMA accreditation of veterinary technology programs is voluntary. Expenses incurred for a site visit are the responsibility of the program. Communication prior to application is encouraged and available by contacting the AVMA Division of Education and Research at 800/248-2862 ext. 6624 www.avma.org.
Veterinary technology programs seeking initial accreditation must submit an Application prior to the enrollment of students.
Veterinary technology programs seeking initial AVMA CVTEA accreditation are required to provide the following on the CVTEA Application and Material Review Form available from AVMA staff:
1. Initial Program Application
* A program director, who is a licensed veterinarian or a credentialed veterinary technician who is a graduate of an AVMA-accredited program must be in place at the time of the initial application for accreditation. The full-time equivalent licensed veterinarian and the full-time equivalent credentialed veterinary technician who is a graduate of an AVMA-accredited program must be on staff three (3) months prior to the enrollment of students to allow adequate time for curriculum development and course preparation.
Beginning in calendar year 2016, the cumulative number of site visits in a 12-month period shall not exceed 50 so all requests may not be met in a given year. The CVTEA may in its sole discretion and for good cause shown give consideration to exceed the maximum number of site visits. Currently accredited programs will be given priority in scheduling.
2. Initial Review
3. Confirmation of Acceptance of Initial ApplicationInformation received from the program will be reviewed by AVMA staff. If it appears that the program is making appropriate progress toward significantly meeting the Standards of Accreditation, AVMA staff will confirm a mutually agreed upon site visit date. Classes must be in session during the site visit evaluation. An initial accreditation site visit is usually conducted when the initial class has completed approximately two-thirds of the curriculum. A self-study report will be due no later than 8 weeks prior to the site visit
4. The Program must then meet the criteria and follow the steps outlined in the Standard Operating Procedures for an Accreditation Site Visit in Section VI part C.INITIAL REVIEW OF THE PROGRAM AND SCHEDULING OF A SITE VISIT IS NOT A GUARANTEE OF ACCREDITATION NOR DOES IT GRANT ANY TEMPORARY ACCREDITATION STATUS.
1. Programs due for re-accreditation are notified of a required site visit approximately one year in advance. Programs should contact AVMA staff to schedule a mutually agreed upon site visit time. Classes must be in session during the site visit evaluation. A self-study report for programs seeking re-accreditation is due 6 weeks prior to the site visit.
1. The program will submit copies of a self-evaluation report (Appendix G) (see also format guidelines in Appendix F) and copies of the college catalog to the site team members, and an electronic copy of the self-evaluation report to AVMA according to the deadlines outlined above for either an initial program or re-accreditation.
2. The self-evaluation report is reviewed by the AVMA for major deficiencies or any other needed clarification. If no major deficiency is apparent, the site visit date is finalized.
3. An evaluation team is formed. The evaluation team consists of five members: a chair who is a CVTEA member or past CVTEA member who has completed their term within the previous three years, a veterinarian who should be a member of the state veterinary medical association, a veterinary technician, a public member, and an AVMA staff member. AVMA staff is responsible for identifying the CVTEA member and securing the state veterinarian member. The program director is responsible for providing the names, addresses, phone, and email information of the public member and the veterinary technician as follows:
4. AVMA staff will write a first draft report based on the self-evaluation materials and send the draft Report of Evaluation to the evaluation team.
5. The site visit evaluation is conducted. The site visit will be structured to include sites where clinical and/or technical instruction is provided. The evaluation team will:
6. After the site visit, a second draft Report of Evaluation will be prepared by AVMA staff and distributed to the evaluation team for review and appropriate changes.
7. A third draft Report of Evaluation will be submitted to the program director of the institution for verification and comment. If the third draft ROE contains critical and/or major deficiencies, these findings may result in an adverse decision upon review by the full committee. An adverse decision is defined as withholding initial or renewed accreditation, denial of a request for change of accreditation status, or the granting of less than full accreditation status once full accreditation status has been granted. The program must notify AVMA staff of the intent to respond to the critical and/or major deficiencies within ten (10) business days after receipt of the third draft report of evaluation and file its response with the committee within twenty (20) business days after receipt of the third draft report of evaluation. The Program's response must only include documentation, data, or other information relevant to critical and/or major deficiencies identified in the ROE that may result in an adverse accreditation decision. The Committee reserves the right to conduct a special site visit, as needed, to validate information submitted for reconsideration.
8. The site team chair will present a final draft Report of Evaluation, the program's response, if any, and site visit information to the CVTEA at the earliest possible regular meeting. Reports from site visits conducted less than 60 days prior to a CVTEA meeting may be deferred and considered at the next Committee meeting. AVMA staff will provide information about the specific dates for consideration of a particular report.
If the Committee develops additional critical and/or major deficiencies not presented to the program in paragraph 7, then it will defer the accreditation decision, give written notice to the program of each critical and major deficiency, and provide the program with an opportunity to respond in writing. The program must notify the Committee of its intent to respond to these additional critical and/or major deficiencies within ten (10) business days after receipt of the final draft report of evaluation and file its response with the committee within twenty (20) business days after receipt of the final draft report of evaluation.
The Committee will consider the written response and documentation sent by the program within forty (40) business days of receipt. The Committee reserves the right to conduct a special site visit, as needed, to validate information submitted for reconsideration. Should an adverse accreditation decision be made the program will be notified in writing of the reasons for the action and reminded of the appeal process.
After opportunities to respond in writing or appeal have passed or the processes completed, the action of the Committee is considered final and a final report of evaluation is prepared.
9. CVTEA will determine the accreditation status of the program based on a majority vote of CVTEA members.
10. AVMA staff will notify the program director and chief executive officer of the institution of the program's assigned status and provide a final Report of Evaluation with recommendations for improvement. Deficiencies, recommendations, and final reports of site visits are considered private communication between CVTEA and the institution involved. Release of reports shall be at the discretion of the institution. AVMA will notify the state veterinary medical association and state regulatory agencies of the assigned accreditation status of the program.
11. AVMA staff will include the program on its published list of accredited programs after a 30-day period for potential appeals.
12. The evaluation process is repeated at five year intervals until a program has been fully accredited for two cycles, after which time site visits are conducted at six-year intervals. Major changes or concerns can also precipitate site visits.
13. All site visit participants are required to sign an AVMA CVTEA confidentiality agreement. (Section II, page 2)
14. Programs are responsible for all costs associated with the accreditation process including the site visit.
CVTEA will review the annual report at its next meeting and and if the Committee finds that a program has not made sufficient progress on critical and/or major deficiencies or other issues which may result in an adverse accreditation decision, it will follow the procedures set forth above in paragraph 8 and will provide written notice to the program of critical and/or major deficiencies or other issues, and provide the program with an opportunity to respond in writing. The program must notify the Committee of its intent to respond within ten (10) business days after receipt of the report evaluation letter and file its response with the Committee within twenty (20) business days of receipt of the report evaluation letter. The CVTEA member who manages the program and CVTEA chair or vice chair will review any submissions and recommend committee action on accreditation status within forty (40) business days of the receipt of the response from the program. The recommendations and program submissions will be electronically copied to all CVTEA members for comment. Each member has the right to request full committee deliberation and vote. If at the end of 72 hours no requests for full committee deliberation have been made, the recommendation of the designated reviewers will be final and the program will be notified. If full committee deliberation is requested, the committee will vote. Following review, AVMA staff will report its decision to the program director, chief executive office of the school, the state VMA, and other appropriate agencies
A program that has been fully accredited for five consecutive years, and has again been granted full accreditation status after a second complete evaluation and site visit, shall be required to submit biennial reports and shall be subject to a complete re-evaluation every six years unless major changes in the program indicate to CVTEA that an earlier site visit may be necessary.
Programs are placed on either a spring or fall annual or biennial reporting schedule. Reports are due for review approximately 60 days prior to the scheduled CVTEA meeting. AVMA staff will announce when reports are due at least six months in advance of the due date. The CVTEA reserves the right to lower the accreditation of a program that, after due notice, fails to submit a self-evaluation, annual, biennial, or interim report. Subsequent accreditation will be considered only after submission of application for accreditation, self-evaluation and other accreditation materials, followed by a site visit to the program. Based on the progress noted in an annual or biennial report, the CVTEA may request an appearance of a program representative at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The cost for such an appearance will be borne by the respective program/parent institution.
Substantive changes in the program must be reported within sixty days of implementation. This report must document how the program will continue to comply with the Standards. Failure to meet any reporting requirement may result in administrative probation or other changes in accreditation status.
Approval of substantive changes is at the discretion of the CVTEA based upon the information received and continued compliance with the standards. A site visit may be required to verify the reported substantive changes.
Accreditation may be withdrawn from a program that fails to provide a report of self-evaluation at least 6 weeks before a scheduled site visit; fails to provide an annual, biennial, or requested interim report by the published due date prior to the CVTEA meeting at which the program is to be reviewed; or fails to invite a site visit at the required time.
A program for which accreditation has been withdrawn may apply for accreditation after one year by submitting a report of self evaluation and other accreditation forms, requesting a site visit, and demonstrating that it meets the Standards of Accreditation.
Programs with probationary accreditation must show annual progress toward achieving full accreditation and meet the requirements for full accreditation within a two-year period. Full accreditation may be sought at any time by providing evidence in a self-evaluation and re-accreditation report, showing that the program has complied with the deficiencies related to the program's accreditation status. Those deficiencies are contained in the Report of Evaluation. Subsequent to receipt of the report, a site visit by an evaluation team may be required.
Programs have the right to appeal adverse accreditation decisions. The CVTEA will notify the appropriate credentialing agencies and the public within thirty days of any final adverse accreditation decision. Programs may reapply for accreditation one year after accreditation has been withdrawn. Please refer to the Procedures for Appeal of Adverse Decisions on Accreditation (Section IX).
Programs reapplying for accreditation following an initial site visit will be assessed a reapplication fee equal to the amount of the application fee.
As a principal goal of accreditation is to improve educational outcomes, it is recognized that observation of the practices of the CVTEA as they conduct veterinary technology accreditation site visits is of value to certain individuals. To facilitate this process, the following guidelines have been established.Observers are welcome to participate in CVTEA site visits if the following conditions are met.
2. The chairperson of the site team and the Program director of the host institution must agree to each proposed observer.
3. A maximum of two observers (from all sources) may be accommodated on each site visit. Observers will be selected on a first come, first served basis within the constraints of the priority list in Item 1 (see above).
4. The observer may be recused from sessions that the site team chairperson considers confidential.
5. Observer requirements