Home News Issues My AVMA Jobs Animal Health Public Health AVMA@Work
Search Tips | Advanced Search
  
 
Search within Issues only.
Animal Welfare

Animal Welfare Committee



Animal Welfare Division



Contacts


Policies

Animal Welfare Policies


Hot Topics

Confinement Housing Initiatives



Unwanted Horses


Science & Educational Materials

Backgrounders



Frequently Asked Questions



Animal Welfare Forum Proceedings



Brochures & Booklets



Presentations


Euthanasia

Guidelines on Euthanasia (PDF)


Legislative & Regulatory Issues

Federal Legislative Issues



Federal Regulatory Issues



State Legislative Issues



International Issues


Awards/Contests

Animal Welfare Award



Humane Award



Intercollegiate Assessment Contest


Additional Resources

Liaisons



JAVMA News



Press Releases



Meetings



Related Links



Human-Animal Bond


AVMA Member area = AVMA/SAVMA  Members Only


Get Adobe reader

Some files on this page require Adobe Reader software. Click on the image above to download it for free from the Adobe site.





 
California Proposition 2
 

California Proposition 2, a ballot initiative that will go before California voters in November 2008, would require that egg-laying hens, veal calves, and pregnant sows have room enough to lie down, stand, turn around, and fully extend their limbs, effective 2015. The initiative, Standards for Confining Farm Animals, is sponsored by a coalition of animal protection groups and backed by the California VMA, but some CVMA members have formed the Association of California Veterinarians largely because they disagree with their association's support for Proposition 2.

Although the American Veterinary Medical Association applauds every effort to promote animal welfare, the AVMA is concerned about possible, unintended negative consequences to animal welfare of enacting Proposition 2. The following informational resources help explain the issue and the AVMA's concerns about Proposition 2.

More on Proposition 2:
AVMA letter to the New York Times
AVMA Concerned About California Ballot Initiative
AVMA Issues Statement on California Proposition 2 (Press Release)
A Comparison of Cage and Non-cage Systems for Housing Laying Hens
Questions and Answers Regarding California Proposition 2

California Papers Weigh In:
Prop. 2 -- Not for voters: Let Legislature make law (Vacaville Reporter, October 20, 2008)
No on 2 (The Press-Enterprise, October 16, 2008)
Proposition 2 is a well-intentioned effort - that voters should reject (Fresno Bee, October 16, 2008)
Editorial: Flawed measures should be rejected (Chico Enterprise Record, October 16, 2008)
No on Prop. 2 (Santa Rosa Press-Democrat, October 13, 2008)
Vote no on Proposition 2 (Napa Valley Register, Oct. 9, 2008)
Prop. 2 would destroy our egg industry (Modesto Bee, Oct. 5, 2008)
Uncertain Animal Benefits (Long Beach Press-Telegram, Sept. 29, 2008)
No on Prop 2 (Los Angeles Times, Sept. 25, 2008)
Why Proposition 2 Is a Bad Idea (San Francisco Chronicle, Sept. 24, 2008)
California Prop. 2 Editorial: A Well-Intentioned Pig in a Poke (Orange County Register, Sept. 24, 2008)

 

American Veterinary Medical Association
Copyright © 2009