Home News Issues My AVMA Jobs Animal Health Public Health @Work Blog Newsletters
Search Tips | Advanced Search     Bookmark and Share
  
 
Search within State Legislative Resources only.

About us



State legislative updates



Contact us

 

Issues

Animal welfare



Business issues



Dog bite prevention



Euthanasia



Non-economic damages



Ownership vs. guardianship



Pharmacy and vaccination



Scope of practice issues

 

Resources

Resources by state



2012 State legislation



2012 State regulations



State VMAs



Legal outreach program



Veterinary state boards



Allied associations



Advocacy tools

 

AVMA Member area = AVMA/SAVMA  Members Only


Get Adobe reader

Some files on this page require Adobe Reader software. Click on the image above to download it for free from the Adobe site.

 




Issues
Updated May 2011
 
LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS:
Antifreeze Bittering Agent - State Legislation
 

States continue to consider adding a bittering agent (most commonly, denatonium benzoate) to antifreeze in order to protect pets and small children from ingesting the substance. California has required the addition of a bittering agent to antifreeze since 2002 and Oregon since 1991. Since 2005, Arizona, Georgia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin have passed legislation requiring the addition of a bittering agent to antifreeze.

In 2006 and 2007, Illinois and Pennsylvania adopted resolutions in support of the passage of the federal antifreeze bittering additive legislation.

The Alabama, Missouri, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina legislatures have considered but not passed bills requiring a bittering additive in recent years.

At the federal level, the Antifreeze Bittering Act was introduced in the 108th Congress (2005-06). S. 1110 did not advance after its placement on the Senate Legislative calendar. In the U.S. House, H.R. 2567 passed the House Energy and Commerce Committee, but did not progress any further. The AVMA supported the passage of both bills and encourages the use of clear warning labels emphasizing the potential danger of Ethylene Glycol to animals. Similar legislation, HR 615, was introduced in the 111th Congress in 2009.

 

Source: Staff research, AVMA State Legislative and Regulatory Affairs Department
Contact: Adrian Hochstadt, AVMA Assistant Director, State Legislative and Regulatory Affairs, 847-285-6780.