Home News Issues My AVMA Jobs Animal Health Public Health
Search Tips | Advanced Search
  
 
Search within State Legislative Resources only.

About us



State legislative updates



Contact us


Issues

Animal welfare



Business issues



Dog bite prevention



Euthanasia



Non-economic damages



Ownership vs. guardianship



Pharmacy and vaccination



Scope of practice issues



Trends


Resources

Resources by state



Advocacy tools

 

AVMA Member area = AVMA/SAVMA  Members Only


Get Adobe reader

Some files on this page require Adobe Reader software. Click on the image above to download it for free from the Adobe site.

 




Issues
Updated June 2007
 
LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS:
Antifreeze Bittering Agent - State Legislation
 

States continue to consider adding a bittering agent (most commonly, denatonium benzoate) to antifreeze in order to protect pets and small children from ingesting the substance. California has required the addition of a bittering agent to antifreeze since 2002 and Oregon since 1991. New Mexico and Maine also now require the addition of a bittering agent to antifreeze. Over the course of 2005-2006, the Alabama, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Virginia legislatures introduced bills requiring a bittering additive. In Massachusetts this type of legislation has been defeated two times and in Nebraska, it has been defeated once.

In the 2007 legislative session, Arizona (SB 1323) adopted legislation to require a bittering additive in antifreeze. Illinois (HB 186), Maine (HB 579), New York (HB 3638/SB 4205) and Ohio (HB 38) also introduced bills to consider the issue. The bills in Illinois, New York and Ohio are still pending.

At the federal level, the Antifreeze Bittering Act was introduced in the U.S. Senate (S. 1110), but did not advance after its placement on the Senate Legislative calendar (3/14/06). In the U.S. House, H.R. 2567 passed the House Energy and Commerce Committee, but did not progress (7/12/06). In 2006, Pennsylvania adopted a resolution in support of the passage of the federal antifreeze bittering additive legislation. The AVMA supported the passage of both bills and encourages the use of clear warning labels emphasizing the potential danger of Ethylene Glycol to animals.

 

Source: Staff research, AVMA State Legislative and Regulatory Affairs Department
Contact: Julia Fullerton, AVMA Senior State Policy Analyst, 847-285-6697
 

American Veterinary Medical Association
Copyright © 2008