Home News Issues My AVMA Jobs Animal Health Public Health @Work Blog Newsletters
Search Tips | Advanced Search     Bookmark and Share
  
 
Search within Advocacy only.

National Issues

Congressional Activities



Federal Regulatory Activities



Other National Activities

 

State Issues

State legislative resources

 

Get involved

About AVMAPAC



AVMA-CAN Government
Action Center



AVMA fellowships



Student externships


Newsletters

The AVMA Advocate



AccessPAC

 

AVMA Member area = AVMA/SAVMA  Members Only


Get Adobe reader

Some files on this page require Adobe Reader software. Click on the image above to download it for free from the Adobe site.

 




 
Federal regulatory environmental issues

2010-05 USFWS Injurious Wildlife Species
Formal title:
Docket ID number: FWS-R9-FHC-2008-0015 – Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing the Boa Constrictor, Four Python Species, and Four Anaconda Species as Injurious Reptiles.

View Federal Register document (PDF 133Kb)
Action
Proposed rule; availability of draft environmental assessment and draft economic analysis.
Brief description

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) proposes to amend its regulations to add Indian python (Python molurus, including Burmese python Python molurus bivittatus), reticulated python (Broghammerus reticulatus or Python reticulatus), Northern African python (Python sebae), Southern African python (Python natalensis), boa constrictor (Boa constrictor), yellow anaconda (Eunectes notaeus), DeSchauensee's anaconda (Eunectes deschauenseei), green anaconda (Eunectes murinus), and Beni anaconda (Eunectes beniensis) to the list of injurious reptiles. The list would prohibit the importation of any live animal, gamete, viable egg, or hybrid of these nine constrictor snakes into the United States, except as specifically authorized.

AVMA response

The AVMA recognizes the economic hardship this rule may pose upon those engaged in the exotic pet trade. Nevertheless, the AVMA supports regulatory efforts to prohibit private ownership and the importation for the purpose of private ownership of non-native animals that threaten public health, domestic animal health, indigenous wild animal health, agriculture, or the ecosystem, as well as those species whose welfare is unacceptably compromised. Furthermore, in order to protect animal, human, and environmental health, the AVMA supports the use of appropriate surveillance and control measures on international commerce and travel to prevent the entry of foreign disease vectors and invasive species into the United States.

The AVMA supports scientific, risk-based decisions on the importation of animals and animal products, and believes that imported animals and animal products must present no more than a negligible risk. In addition, integrated and standardized regulations should be developed and implemented nationally to address the import, sale, movement, and health of exotic, non-domesticated, and wild-caught animals. The AVMA agrees with the scientific based evaluation of each of the nine constrictor species (and their respective hybrids) individually and in light of the criteria for and repercussions of potentially listing each as an injurious species, and the AVMA supports the USFWS in listing each of these nine constrictor species as injurious under the Lacey Act.

Full AVMA Response:
The AVMA responded on May 11, 2010 (PDF, 1Mb)
USFWS Final Rule:
Listing Three Python Species and One Anaconda Species as Injurious Reptiles (PDF, 318 Kb)